In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think it is a good rule or a bad rule? Use specific reasons and details to support your position.
--------------------------------
I strongly opine that ban on Smoking at public places is a good rule.
Smoking is Cancerous is a proven fact. Cancer is an extremely dreadful and life taking disease. Thanks to the health researchers who have found that passive smoking is much more harmful. Active smoking is done by the smoker himself and Passive Smoking is done by the people near him by way of inhaling the smoke exhaled by the active smoker. Passive smoke causes allergies to many, particularly asthmatic patients may get severe asthmatic attack and may need immediate hospitalization and may be required to be put on clinical oxygen. Animals are highly allergic to smoke. Particularly tiny and tender pets like cat, dog and birds are over sensitive and feel hard to breathe and start coughing badly. Hence persons having pets must never smoke.
Smoking causes diseases like: -
Cancer, Bronchitis, Asthmas, Impotency in men,
Still-birth in case of women. Heart Attack, Loss of teeth
Those who smoke in air-conditioned offices and houses, cause many times more harm to themselves and be others too who visit and sit in their room for business or social visits.
Smokers exhale many injurious gases with smoke those are inhaled by passive smokers. Smoking pollutes the environment and that is unhealthy. In order to maintain healthy environment smoking must be banned at public places and offices.
Summarizing, in the interest of the well being of the public by large, exercising of ban on smoking at public places by the respective government is right and a good rule.
(261 Words)
