Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree that human needs of farming, housing and industry are a priority and certainly more important. This is because of the reason that human population is exorbitantly increasing day by day and simultaneously the needs are also increasing. We need more food, more vehicles, more houses, more space for business, more industries and many more. Hence people need more area of land to fulfill these requirements. We need more and more land for farming and agriculture. Land is required for more of airports, roads, hotels, hospitals and what not. However it does not mean that land for endangered animals is unimportant but when it comes to relative importance, the latter gets second priority.
Nevertheless it is a high time that citizens must give a deep thought to the problem of over population and realize the dangers short comings of it. As urged by governments from time to time, people must ensure not to have more than two children in a family.
People must adopt measures of family planning as suggested by Governments. This will greatly help prevent over growth of population and help increase share of resource to every individual. It is not out of place to quote a great advice by a learned man that: - “Reduce Your Needs and You Shall Be Rich.”
In conclusion, although human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important saving land for endangered animals is also important. This can be achieved through sincere and dedicated efforts of all countrymen towards exercising control over the increase in population.
(257 Words)
